|
Electricity Deregulation
When the State
of Texas passed legislation to deregulate electricity, we organized a
consortium of 19 buildings managed by Hines Management Services and
negotiated, on behalf of these properties, with three potential providers.
Result – A reduction in electricity costs for these buildings of
$18,000,000 over the two-year life of the contract. The portion of this
savings directly attributable to the Hines-formed consortium was
$3,600,000, a savings that could not have been realized without this
collective effort.
To put this in perspective, the savings to the operating costs of Williams
Company in Williams Tower in Houston was almost $1,500,000, of which
$300,000 was the result of the negotiating strength of the Hines-formed
consortium.
Telecommunications
Companies’ Right of Access
When the
deregulation of the telecommunications industry became a reality, Hines
Management Services, as well as other real estate companies, was being
deluged with companies demanding building access. Additionally, we were
concerned about the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) ruling that these
providers would be given access rights, and for no fee paid to the
property owner.
Hines organized a group of real estate firms to attack this issue. We
obtained legal counsel, split the costs among the firms and approached the
PUC to express our views. While this issue is not totally resolved, Hines
and other local real estate organizations continue to remain advocates for
private property rights by working with legislatures and the Public
Utility Commission.
Result: The various providers have not been given unrestricted access to
the properties, and, when they do provide service to a building, they are
required to pay a fee to the building. This even includes the incumbent
provider, a battle that was difficult and protracted.
Broadband
Telecommunications
When the
explosion of broadband Internet access occurred, Hines set up strategic
alliances with major real estate companies in the U. S. Our efforts
produced deals with two different providers, our owners incurring no
out-of-pocket costs to install the service, monthly rent paid by the
provider and revenue sharing for the building.
When this industry imploded, Hines-managed properties suffered limited
financial impact.
-back to top- |
|





 
|